Fig. 5

Suciraslimab promotes Aβ phagocytosis. A BLI analysis of mouse CD22-Aβ interaction. Association: 600s; Dissociation: 600s. B BLI analysis of human CD22-Aβ interaction. Association: 600s; Dissociation: 600s. C Immunofluorescent staining and quantitation of FITC-Aβ on HEK293 and HEK293-hCD22 cells. Student t-test, ** P < 0.01. N = 20–21, from 3 independent experiments. D Representative image and quantitation of Proximity-ligation assay of CD22-Aβ complex in HMC-3. Student’s t-test, **** P < 0.0001. N = 41, from 3 independent experiments. E Structural alignment of mouse CD22 and human CD22. The structures of both mouse and human CD22 extracellular domain were generated with Alphafold2. Pairwise structural alignment score (TM-score) higher than 0.5 assumes generally proteins aligned of the same fold. F Surface CD22 expression in HMC-3 after suciraslimab treatment. One-way ANOVA, F = 2.892, P = 0.0139. Tukey post hoc test, * P < 0.05. N = 76–83. G Surface suciraslimab binding on HMC-3. One-way ANOVA, F = 125, P < 0.0001. Tukey post hoc test, ** P = 0.002. N = 3. H Effect of suciraslimab on FITC-Aβ phagocytosis in HMC-3. One-way ANOVA, F = 43.92, P < 0.0001. Tukey post hoc test, * P = 0.046, ** P = 0.0018, **** P < 0.0001. N = 3. I Effect of suciraslimab on FITC-Aβ phagocytosis in PMA-differentiated MO3.13. Two-tailed Student’s t test, P = 0.0477, t = 2.482, df = 6